Rogers v. Powell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6945
CORNELL ROGERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ERICA POWELL, Nurse; GRAY, Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00468-AJT-TRJ)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 7, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cornell Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Cornell Rogers appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Rogers v. Powell, No. 1:10-cv-00468-AJT-TRJ
(E.D. Va. filed June 28, 2010, and entered June 29, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. Powell (Rogers v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.