Rogers v. Powell

Fourth Circuit

Rogers v. Powell

395 F. App'x 61

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2010·No. No. 10-6945·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cornell Rogers appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We [62]*62have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rogers v. Powell, No. 1:10-cv-00468-AJTTRJ (E.D. Va. filed June 28, 2010, and entered June 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cornell Rogers appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We [62]*62have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rogers v. Powell, No. 1:10-cv-00468-AJTTRJ (E.D. Va. filed June 28, 2010, and entered June 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rogers v. Powell, 395 F. App'x 61 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

395 F. App'x 61 (Rogers v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related