Rogers v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., LP

68 So. 3d 781, 2011 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 40, 2011 WL 480043
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rogers v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., LP. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 94
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided February 11, 2011·No. 2070985·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

On certiorari review in this case, the Alabama Supreme Court overruled Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Hepp, 882 So.2d 329 (Ala.2003), Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Smitherman, 743 So.2d 442 (Ala.1999), and Department of Industrial Relations v. Jaco, 337 So.2d 374 (Ala.Civ.App.1976)—cases upon which this court relied in af *782 firming the trial court’s judgment — to the extent that they hold that, when an employer terminates an employee’s job on the asserted basis of misconduct by the employee, the employee bears the burden of proof on the question whether he is disqualified from obtaining unemployment-compensation benefits. Ex parte Rogers, 68 So.3d 773, 774 (Ala.2010). Based on the supreme court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

PITTMAN, BRYAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., LP, 68 So. 3d 781, 2011 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 40, 2011 WL 480043 (Ala. Ct. App. 2011).

68 So. 3d 781 (Rogers v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Smitherman
743 So. 2d 442 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1999)
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Hepp
882 So. 2d 329 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)
Department of Ind. Relations v. Jaco
337 So. 2d 374 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Rogers v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.
68 So. 3d 773 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2010)