Rogers v. NYU Hospitals Doctors

S.D. New York

Rogers v. NYU Hospitals Doctors

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 15, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-06974·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSHUA ROGERS, Plaintiff, -against- 24cv6974 (LTS) NYU HOSPITALS DOCTORS; BELLEVUE CIVIL JUDGMENT HOSPITAL; TIBERIUS FRAY; TILMA FRUETEUR, Defendants. For the reasons stated in the January 10, 2025, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court’s judgment would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 15, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSHUA ROGERS, Plaintiff, -against- 24cv6974 (LTS) NYU HOSPITALS DOCTORS; BELLEVUE CIVIL JUDGMENT HOSPITAL; TIBERIUS FRAY; TILMA FRUETEUR, Defendants. For the reasons stated in the January 10, 2025, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court’s judgment would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 15, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Rogers v. NYU Hospitals Doctors, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Rogers v. NYU Hospitals Doctors (Rogers v. NYU Hospitals Doctors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related