Rogers v. Gilbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rogers v. Gilbert

214 A.D.2d 956, 627 N.Y.S.2d 609

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1995

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 A.D.2d 956 (Rogers v. Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Gilbert, 214 A.D.2d 956, 627 N.Y.S.2d 609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order determining that he willfully violated an order of child support and granting judgment to petitioner for arrears. He also appeals from a subsequent order directing his commitment to jail pursuant to Family Court Act § 454 (3) (a). Respondent has paid the arrears in full [957]*957and the order of commitment has expired. Thus, respondent’s challenges to those orders are moot (see, Matter of De Lorenzo v Spillane, 206 AD2d 763, 764; see also, Matter of Bickwid v Deutsch, 210 AD2d 400; Dowd v Dowd, 164 AD2d 752, 754). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Taddeo, J.—Child Support Arrears.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order determining that he willfully violated an order of child support and granting judgment to petitioner for arrears. He also appeals from a subsequent order directing his commitment to jail pursuant to Family Court Act § 454 (3) (a). Respondent has paid the arrears in full [957]*957and the order of commitment has expired. Thus, respondent’s challenges to those orders are moot (see, Matter of De Lorenzo v Spillane, 206 AD2d 763, 764; see also, Matter of Bickwid v Deutsch, 210 AD2d 400; Dowd v Dowd, 164 AD2d 752, 754). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Taddeo, J.—Child Support Arrears.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 956, 627 N.Y.S.2d 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-gilbert-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack