Rogers v. Cruger
This text of 3 Johns. 564 (Rogers v. Cruger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition of appeal is in the nature of a declaration ; and the respondents having answered, have thereby admitted the petition to be competent, and have waived all objections to matters of mere form. The present objection should have been made on filing the petition, and before the respondents had answered. The application is now too late. It is contrary to the course of practice in all courts, to allow of objections to matters of form, after an issue is joined on the merits of the cause.
The motion must be denied ; and the argument of thfc cause proceed on the merits of the appeal.
Motion denied.
The cause was, afterwards, argued on the merits of the appeal and the report of the case will he found in the next volume.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Johns. 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-cruger-nysupct-1808.