Rogers v. Bullock

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7551

CHARLES GENE ROGERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN T. BULLOCK; DON G. WOOD; BOYD BENNETT; KENWORTHY; MARY LU ROGERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00350-PTS)

Submitted: May 13, 2008 Decided: June 2, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Gene Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Gene Rogers appeals the order of the magistrate

judge denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate

judge. Rogers v. Bullock, No. 1:06-cv-00350-PTS (M.D.N.C.

Sept. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

-2-