Rogers v. Bullock
This text of Rogers v. Bullock (Rogers v. Bullock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7551
CHARLES GENE ROGERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN T. BULLOCK; DON G. WOOD; BOYD BENNETT; KENWORTHY; MARY LU ROGERS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00350-PTS)
Submitted: May 13, 2008 Decided: June 2, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Gene Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Charles Gene Rogers appeals the order of the magistrate
judge denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge. Rogers v. Bullock, No. 1:06-cv-00350-PTS (M.D.N.C.
Sept. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rogers v. Bullock, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-bullock-ca4-2008.