Rogers v. Blythe
51 Ark. 519
Opinion
The court below found that the note in controversy was given to procure the dismissal of a pending prosecution. The evidence sustained the finding.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. Blythe, 51 Ark. 519 (Ark. 1889).
51 Ark. 519 (Rogers v. Blythe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hughes v. Harrison
155 S.W.2d 690 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1941)
Hines v. Hines
14 S.W.2d 1107 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1929)
Pendleton v. Greever
1920 OK 350 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Calloway v. Western States Lumber Co.
1912 OK 287 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Goodrum v. Merchants & Planters Bank
144 S.W. 198 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Johnson v. Graham Bros.
135 S.W. 853 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1911)
Beal & Doyle Dry Goods Co. v. Barton
97 S.W. 58 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1906)
Kirkland v. Benjamin
55 S.W. 840 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1900)