Kirkland v. Benjamin

55 S.W. 840, 67 Ark. 480, 1900 Ark. LEXIS 130
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 24, 1900·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Battle, J.

“A promissory note made to procure the dismissal of a criminal prosecution, although given for the amount of a debt due to the payee, is contrary to public policy, and void.” Rogers v. Blythe, 51 Ark. 519.

“The general rule is that where an illegal contract has been made, neither courts of law nor equity will interpose to grant any relief to the parties, but will leave them where it finds them, if they have been equally cognizant of the illegality.” Shattuck v. Watson, 53 Ark. 147.

We think that the evidence adduced at the hearing of this cause clearly shows that the notes sued on were executed for the purpose of procuring the dismissal of a criminal prosecution.

The decree of the circuit court is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded; with instructions to the court to dismiss the complaint.

Wood, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkland v. Benjamin, 55 S.W. 840, 67 Ark. 480, 1900 Ark. LEXIS 130 (Ark. 1900).

55 S.W. 840 (Kirkland v. Benjamin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughes v. Harrison
155 S.W.2d 690 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1941)
Hines v. Hines
14 S.W.2d 1107 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1929)
Pendleton v. Greever
1920 OK 350 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Goodrum v. Merchants & Planters Bank
144 S.W. 198 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Johnson v. Graham Bros.
135 S.W. 853 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1911)
Beal & Doyle Dry Goods Co. v. Barton
97 S.W. 58 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1906)