Roger Martin, Jr. v. Edward Murray 19 John Doe
This text of 98 F.3d 1335 (Roger Martin, Jr. v. Edward Murray 19 John Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roger MARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward MURRAY; 19 John Doe Defendants, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6854.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 3, 1996.
Decided Oct. 15, 1996.
Roger Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Local Rule 28(C) for the Eastern District of Virginia, and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.* Martin v. Murray, No. CA-95-1082-2 (E.D.Va. Apr. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We also deny Appellant's motions for an extension of time, a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, and appointment of counsel
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 F.3d 1335, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40079, 1996 WL 590575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-martin-jr-v-edward-murray-19-john-doe-ca4-1996.