Julian Edward Rochester v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jails and Detention Centers

98 F.3d 1335, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40104, 1996 WL 570788
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 3, 1996
Docket96-6061
StatusPublished
Cited by37 cases

This text of 98 F.3d 1335 (Julian Edward Rochester v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jails and Detention Centers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Julian Edward Rochester v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jails and Detention Centers, 98 F.3d 1335, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40104, 1996 WL 570788 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

98 F.3d 1335
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Julian Edward ROCHESTER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Commissioner; South Carolina Department of
Corrections, Jails and Detention Centers,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 96-6061.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 20, 1996
Decided Oct. 3, 1996

Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se.

William Henry Davidson, II, David Leon Morrison, John Thomas Lay, Jr., James Miller Davis, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Appellant failed to provide a transcript of the bench trial at which the district court stated the reasons for denying relief. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2); Powell v. Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1025 (1992). Moreover, Appellant has failed to state a substantial claim justifying preparation of a transcript at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). Consequently, we affirm the district court's order. We deny Appellant's motion for an extension of time to perfect his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ruttenberg v. Jones
464 F. Supp. 2d 536 (E.D. Virginia, 2006)
McCall v. Williams
52 F. Supp. 2d 611 (D. South Carolina, 1999)
United States v. Michael John Accettola
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Frankie Smith v. Eugene Nuth, Warden
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Roger Martin, Jr. v. Edward Murray 19 John Doe
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Ronson O'Shea Barnwell
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Lowe v. Augusta Correctional Center Admin.
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Hyratha C. Spriggs v. Citibank (Maryland), N.A.
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Aaron Brockington
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Marlene C. Seay v. Department of the Navy
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
In Re: Johnathan Lee X Smith
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Muhammad X v. Taylor
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Jill Maureen Arnold
98 F.3d 1335 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 F.3d 1335, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40104, 1996 WL 570788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julian-edward-rochester-v-parker-evatt-commissioner-south-carolina-ca4-1996.