Home/Supreme Court/Roe v. Doe

Roe v. Doe

420 U.S. 307, 95 S. Ct. 1154, 43 L. Ed. 2d 213, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 36
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 19, 1975
Docket73-1446
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 420 U.S. 307 (Roe v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roe v. Doe, 420 U.S. 307, 95 S. Ct. 1154, 43 L. Ed. 2d 213, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 36 (1975).

Opinion

420 U.S. 307 (1975)

ROE ET AL.
v.
DOE.

No. 73-1446.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 18, 1974.
Decided February 19, 1975.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

Marvin M. Karpatkin argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Michael N. Pollet.

Ephraim S. London argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Franklin S. Bonem, Bonnie P. Winawer, and Helen L. Buttenwieser.[*]

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

NOTES

[*] Ira M. Millstein filed a brief for the Association of American Publishers, Inc., as amicus curiae urging reversal.

Joseph Onek filed a brief for the American Psychiatric Assn. et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacK v. US, FBI
653 F. Supp. 70 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Mack v. United States
653 F. Supp. 70 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Population Services International v. Carey
476 F. Supp. 4 (S.D. New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
420 U.S. 307, 95 S. Ct. 1154, 43 L. Ed. 2d 213, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roe-v-doe-scotus-1975.