Rodriguez v. Ward

43 A.D.3d 640, 842 N.Y.S.2d 622
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 22, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 43 A.D.3d 640 (Rodriguez v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Ward, 43 A.D.3d 640, 842 N.Y.S.2d 622 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Janice M. Rosa, J., for Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered August 17, 2007 in a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16. The order dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking to validate her designating petition for the office of City Court Judge for the City of Buffalo in the Democratic primary election to be held on September 18, 2007. Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition. Petitioner failed to provide the requisite proof that service was effectuated in accordance with the terms [641]*641of the order to show cause (see generally Matter of Gershel v Porr, 89 NY2d 327, 331 [1996]), and the court therefore lacked personal jurisdiction over respondents (see Matter of Phillips v Sanfilippo, 306 AD2d 954, 955 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 507 [2003]). In any event, the petition also was properly dismissed on the ground that it failed to “specify the individual determinations of [the Erie County] [B]oard of [Ejections that [petitioner] claims were erroneous, including the signatures that [she] claims were improperly invalidated” (Matter of Jennings v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 32 AD3d 486, 486 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 707 [2006]).

Even assuming, arguendo, that service was properly effectuated and that the petition sufficiently set forth the allegedly erroneous determinations of the Erie County Board of Elections, we nevertheless are unable to determine the merits of petitioner’s contentions inasmuch as the record on appeal is incomplete. Petitioner, “as the appellant,. . . must suffer the consequences” of submitting an incomplete record (Matter of Santoshia L., 202 AD2d 1027, 1028 [1994]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Hennessy v. Oneida County Bd. of Elections
217 A.D.3d 1452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Mohamed v. Abuhamra
172 N.Y.S.3d 265 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Jon Z. (Margaret Z.)
2017 NY Slip Op 4998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Gannon v. Sadeghian
2017 NY Slip Op 4582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
RESETARITS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Resetarits Construction Corp. v. City of Niagara Falls
133 A.D.3d 1229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
CARNEY, PATRICK M. v. WARD, DENNIS E.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Carney v. Ward
120 A.D.3d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
GAITER, DARRYL v. CITY OF BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Gaiter v. City of Buffalo Board of Education
118 A.D.3d 1507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
LOPEZ, WILFREDO v. LUGO, JENNIFER
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Lopez v. Lugo
115 A.D.3d 1237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
CURTO, PATRICIA v. ZITTEL'S DAIRY FARM
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Curto v. Zittel's Dairy Farm
106 A.D.3d 1482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
KILLIAN, ALBERT v. HEIMAN, KEVIN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Killian v. Heiman
105 A.D.3d 1459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
CARSON, JEFFREY M. v. TOWN OF OSWEGO ZONING BOARD OF APPE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Carson v. Town of Oswego Zoning Board of Appeals
100 A.D.3d 1559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Dixon v. Reynolds
65 A.D.3d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 A.D.3d 640, 842 N.Y.S.2d 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-ward-nyappdiv-2007.