GAITER, DARRYL v. CITY OF BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 20, 2014
DocketCA 13-02095
StatusPublished

This text of GAITER, DARRYL v. CITY OF BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION (GAITER, DARRYL v. CITY OF BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GAITER, DARRYL v. CITY OF BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

776 CA 13-02095 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

DARRYL GAITER AND HELEN GAITER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CITY OF BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION AND MARTIN LUTHER KING SCHOOL #39, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

LAW OFFICE OF ERIC B. GROSSMAN, WILLIAMSVILLE (ERIC B. GROSSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Drury, J.), entered February 4, 2013 in a personal injury action. The order awarded plaintiffs monetary damages.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order entered after a nonjury trial, plaintiffs contend that the verdict sheet failed to include an award for past medical expenses despite a stipulation of the parties to the inclusion of such an award in a specified amount. We are unable to determine the merits of plaintiffs’ contention inasmuch as the 28-page record on appeal does not contain sufficient information to enable us to determine whether there was an enforceable stipulation and, if so, whether plaintiffs requested that the verdict sheet contain the alleged stipulated sum for past medical expenses. Plaintiffs, as the appellants, must suffer the consequences of having submitted an incomplete record (see Matter of Rodriguez v Ward, 43 AD3d 640, 641).

Entered: June 20, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. Ward
43 A.D.3d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
GAITER, DARRYL v. CITY OF BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaiter-darryl-v-city-of-buffalo-board-of-education-nyappdiv-2014.