Rodriguez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Rodriguez v. State

45 S.W.2d 1116

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 20, 1932

DocketNo. 15063

StatusPublished

This text of 45 S.W.2d 1116 (Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. State, 45 S.W.2d 1116 (Tex. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for possessing marijuana, under the provisions of article 725a, P. C., enacted by the Forty-Second Legislature, chapter 97 (Vernon’s Ann. P. C. art. 725a). The punishment is two years in the penitentiary.

By proper affidavit it is made to appear that pending appeal appellant escaped from custody. By the terms of article 824, Code Cr. Proc. 1925, this court is ousted of jurisdiction.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for possessing marijuana, under the provisions of article 725a, P. C., enacted by the Forty-Second Legislature, chapter 97 (Vernon’s Ann. P. C. art. 725a). The punishment is two years in the penitentiary.

By proper affidavit it is made to appear that pending appeal appellant escaped from custody. By the terms of article 824, Code Cr. Proc. 1925, this court is ousted of jurisdiction.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 S.W.2d 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-state-texcrimapp-1932.