Rodriguez v. State

38 S.W.2d 1116, 118 Tex. Crim. 499, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 757
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 6, 1931
DocketNo. 14137.
StatusPublished

This text of 38 S.W.2d 1116 (Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. State, 38 S.W.2d 1116, 118 Tex. Crim. 499, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 757 (Tex. 1931).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for murder; punishment, nine years in the penitentiary.

The state’s attorney with this court calls our attention to the fact that the bills of exception and statement of facts herein were filed too late, under the provisions of our statute, for us to consider same. Examination of the record discloses the correctness of this position. Appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled August 30, 1930. The ninety day period allowed him for filing statement of facts and bills of exception expired November 28, 1930. The statement of facts and bills of exception were filed after that time. Benson v. State, 85 Texas Crim. Rep., 126.

*500 The indictment, the charge of the court, the judgment and sentence appear to be regular. No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

A firmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benson v. State
210 S.W. 538 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 S.W.2d 1116, 118 Tex. Crim. 499, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-state-texcrimapp-1931.