Rodriguez v. State

75 So. 3d 391, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19050, 2011 WL 5964343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2011·No. No. 4D10-2016·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The January 2010 postcon-viction motion was untimely. State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006). Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to this 2004 plea. Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

MAY, C.J., GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 75 So. 3d 391, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19050, 2011 WL 5964343 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

75 So. 3d 391 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. State
124 So. 3d 757 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
Laude v. State
126 So. 3d 1149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Cunningham v. State
126 So. 3d 1094 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)