Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State

994 So. 2d 1131, 2008 WL 131999
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 2008
Docket3D08-76
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 994 So. 2d 1131 (Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. State, 994 So. 2d 1131, 2008 WL 131999 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

994 So.2d 1131 (2008)

Chantal RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D08-76.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 15, 2008.

Paul Morris, Miami, for petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Heidi Milan Caballero, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before COPE and GREEN, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In the light of the state's candid—and, we find, correct—confession of error in the trial court's determination, after an Arthur hearing, that the defendant had committed a non-bondable offense, the writ is granted and the cause remanded with directions to the trial court to fix a reasonable bond.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shocki v. Aresty
994 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
994 So. 2d 1131, 2008 WL 131999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.