Rodriguez v. State
61 So. 3d 496, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8011, 2011 WL 2119562
Opinion
We affirm, but we remand with directions to the circuit court to correct Rodriguez’s probation order, which incorrectly states that he was convicted of first-degree murder and sexual battery, and to conform the probation order to the judgment, which accurately reflects that Rodriguez was convicted of second-degree murder. Rodriguez need not be present for this correction.
Affirmed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez v. State, 61 So. 3d 496, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8011, 2011 WL 2119562 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
61 So. 3d 496 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garcia v. State
95 So. 3d 430 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)