Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State

994 So. 2d 1131, 2008 WL 131999
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 15, 2008·No. 3D08-76·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

994 So.2d 1131 (2008)

Chantal RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D08-76.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 15, 2008.

Paul Morris, Miami, for petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Heidi Milan Caballero, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before COPE and GREEN, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In the light of the state's candid—and, we find, correct—confession of error in the trial court's determination, after an Arthur hearing, that the defendant had committed a non-bondable offense, the writ is granted and the cause remanded with directions to the trial court to fix a reasonable bond.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 994 So. 2d 1131, 2008 WL 131999 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

994 So. 2d 1131 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shocki v. Aresty
994 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)