Rodriguez v. State

882 So. 2d 1106, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13842, 2004 WL 2101964

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 807 So. 2d 130 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 22, 2004·No. No. 4D03-4876·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As to pro se appellant’s issue with respect to jurisdiction, see Peppers v. State, 696 So.2d 444 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

FARMER, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 882 So. 2d 1106, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13842, 2004 WL 2101964 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

882 So. 2d 1106 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

696 So. 2d 444 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)