Rodriguez v. State

792 So. 2d 600, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 2001 WL 912874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 719 So. 2d 1215
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 2001·No. No. 2D01-2108·Published

Opinion

BLUE, Chief Judge.

Mario Lira Rodriguez appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Rodriguez made a facially sufficient claim that his plea was involuntary based on Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). The trial court denied the motion as untimely because it was filed more than two years after Rodriguez’s conviction became final on direct appeal. In so doing, the [601]*601trial court apparently overlooked this court’s decision in Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), which held that a defendant shall have two years from the issuance of the supreme court’s opinion in Heggs to file a rule 3.850 motion challenging his or her plea on that basis. Rodriguez’s motion was thus timely. We therefore reverse and remand for an evi-dentiary hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

FULMER and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 792 So. 2d 600, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 2001 WL 912874 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

792 So. 2d 600 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)