Rodriguez v. State
Opinion
Mario Lira Rodriguez appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Rodriguez made a facially sufficient claim that his plea was involuntary based on Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). The trial court denied the motion as untimely because it was filed more than two years after Rodriguez’s conviction became final on direct appeal. In so doing, the [601]*601trial court apparently overlooked this court’s decision in Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), which held that a defendant shall have two years from the issuance of the supreme court’s opinion in Heggs to file a rule 3.850 motion challenging his or her plea on that basis. Rodriguez’s motion was thus timely. We therefore reverse and remand for an evi-dentiary hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
792 So. 2d 600 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.