Rodriguez v. State
541 So. 2d 797, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1035, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2213, 1989 WL 39625
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1286 →
Opinion
The defendant appeals his convictions, for Trafficking in Cocaine and Conspiracy to Traffic in Cocaine, claiming that the State failed to establish a sufficient chain of custody for the cocaine to be admitted in evidence against him. The State of Florida agrees that Dodd v. State, 537 So.2d 626 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1988),1 is controlling, and requires reversal of appellant’s convictions.
Accordingly, the convictions and sentences under review are reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez v. State, 541 So. 2d 797, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1035, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2213, 1989 WL 39625 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
541 So. 2d 797 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dodd v. State
537 So. 2d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)