Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rodriguez v. State

483 So. 2d 557, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 506, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11484

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 25, 1986

DocketNo. 85-1539

StatusPublished

This text of 483 So. 2d 557 (Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. State, 483 So. 2d 557, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 506, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted. State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted. State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

483 So. 2d 557, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 506, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack