Rodriguez v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Rodriguez v. People

238 P.3d 1283, 2010 WL 3623640

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedSeptember 20, 2010

Docket09SC132

StatusPublished

Cited by26 cases

This text of 238 P.3d 1283 (Rodriguez v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. People, 238 P.3d 1283, 2010 WL 3623640 (Colo. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice Rice, Justice Coats and Justice Eid are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals in People v. Rodriguez, 209 P.3d 1151 (Colo.App.2008) should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Hobbs and Justice Martinez are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice BENDER does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Justice Rice, Justice Coats and Justice Eid are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals in People v. Rodriguez, 209 P.3d 1151 (Colo.App.2008) should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Hobbs and Justice Martinez are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice BENDER does not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 P.3d 1283, 2010 WL 3623640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-people-colo-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack