Rodriguez v. Hasa HRA

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 21, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-06451·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LARRY RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, 24cv6451 (LTS) -against- CIVIL JUDGMENT HASA HRA, ET AL., Defendants. For the reasons stated in the August 20, 2025, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court’s judgment would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: August 21, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Hasa HRA, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Rodriguez v. Hasa HRA (Rodriguez v. Hasa HRA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)