Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Correction
This text of 40 A.3d 318 (Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eddie RODRIGUEZ
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
April E. Brodeur, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.
Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The petitioner Eddie Rodriguez' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 336, 27 A.3d 404 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly apply Phillips v. Warden, 220 Conn. 112, 595 A.2d 1356 (1991), and conclude that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate that the trial attorney had a conflict of interest of constitutional magnitude?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A.3d 318, 304 Conn. 911, 2012 WL 1352702, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-commissioner-of-correction-conn-2012.