Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Correction

40 A.3d 318, 304 Conn. 911, 2012 WL 1352702, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 141
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 27, 2012·No. SC 18940·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

40 A.3d 318 (2012)
304 Conn. 911

Eddie RODRIGUEZ
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

SC 18940

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 27, 2012.

April E. Brodeur, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Eddie Rodriguez' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 336, 27 A.3d 404 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly apply Phillips v. Warden, 220 Conn. 112, 595 A.2d 1356 (1991), and conclude that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate that the trial attorney had a conflict of interest of constitutional magnitude?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Correction, 40 A.3d 318, 304 Conn. 911, 2012 WL 1352702, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 141 (Colo. 2012).

40 A.3d 318 (Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014
State v. Ayala
40 A.3d 318 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)
Carmichael v. Stonkus
39 A.3d 1121 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)