Carmichael v. Stonkus
39 A.3d 1121, 304 Conn. 911
Opinion
Stanrod T. CARMICHAEL et al.
v.
John J. STONKUS et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Eddi Z. Zyko, Middlebury, in support of the petition.
John M. Wolfson, Hartford, and Benjamin M. Wattenmaker, in opposition.
The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 302, 34 A.3d 1026, is denied.
McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carmichael v. Stonkus, 39 A.3d 1121, 304 Conn. 911 (Colo. 2012).
39 A.3d 1121 (Carmichael v. Stonkus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Homebridge Financial Services, Inc. v. Jakubiec
223 Conn. App. 517 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2024)
Brewer v. Commissioner of Correction
208 A.3d 314 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)
Jordan v. Biller
196 A.3d 401 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2018)
State v. Hearl
190 A.3d 42 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2018)
Fishbein v. Menchetti
138 A.3d 1061 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2016)
U.S. Bank National Assn. v. Sorrentino
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2015
Clelford v. Bristol
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2014
Litvack v. Artusio
49 A.3d 762 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)
In Re Alba P.-V.
42 A.3d 393 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Correction
40 A.3d 318 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)