Rodriguez v. Burnett

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 8, 2022·No. 7:22-cv-02198·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. RALPH RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE -against- No, 22-CV-02198 (PMH)

EDWARD BURNETT, et al., Defendants.

PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: Ralph Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Fishkill Correctional Facility, brings this action pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 ef seg., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794. He asserts that during his confinement at Fishkill, Defendants violated his rights. By Order dated May 27, 2022, Judge Swain granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis “IFP”),' This case was re-assigned to me on June 6, 2022. DISCUSSION Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.* Walker y, Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir, 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process

' Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)C1). ? Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that summonses be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that suramonses be issued, The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued,

...in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c}(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for the following defendants: the State of New York; Edward R. Burnett, Superintendent; Akinola Franci Akinyombo, Deputy Superintendent; Davachi M. Sullivan, Nurse Practitioner; Sally A. Reams, Supervisor of Inmate Grievance Program; John F. Woods, Deputy Superintendent of Program; Alexandra Ayana Gibbons, Correctional Officer; Luis Gonzalez, Assistant Deputy Superintendent; Stephen Urbanski, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Sharon L. Frost, Deputy Superintendent of Administration; and Charmaine Waylon, Nurse Administrator. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon these defendants. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is instructed to issue summonses for Defendants State of New York, Burnett, Akinyombo, Sullivan, Reams, Woods, Gibbons, Gonzalez, Urbanski, Frost, and Waylon, complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for these defendants, and deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service all documents necessary to effect service.

The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: White Plains, New York June 7, 2022 ( Wi PHILIP M. HALPERN United States District Judge

/

.

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

1. State of New York Attorney General of State of New York 28 Liberty Street New York, NY 10005 2, Edward Burnett Superintendent Fishkill Correctional Facility 18 Strack Drive Beacon, NY 12508-0307 3. Akinola Franci Akinyombo Deputy Superintendent Fishkill Correctional Facility 18 Strack Drive Beacon, NY 12508-0307 4, Davachi M. Sullivan Nurse Practitioner Fishkill Correctional Facility 18 Strack Drive Beacon, NY 12508-0307 5. Sally A. Reams Supervisor of Inmate Grievance Program Fishkill Correctional Facility . 18 Strack Drive Beacon, NY 12508-0307 6. John F. Woeds Deputy Superintendent of Program Fishkill Correctional Facility 18 Strack Drive Beacon, NY 12508-0307 7, Alexandra Ayana Gibbons Correctional Officer Fishkill Correctional Facility 18 Strack Drive Beacon, NY¥ 12508-0307 8. Luis Gonzalez Assistant Deputy Superintendent Fishkill Correctional Facility

18 Strack Drive Beacon, NY 12508-0307 9, Stephen Urbanski Deputy Superintendent of Security Fishkill Correctional Facility 18 Strack Drive Beacon, NY 12508-0307 10. Sharon L. Frost Deputy Superintendent of Administration Fishkill Correctional Facility 18 Strack Drive Beacon, NY 12508-0307 {l. Charmaine Waylon Nurse Administrator Fishkill Correctional Facility 18 Strack Drive Beacon, NY 12508-0307

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Burnett, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Rodriguez v. Burnett (Rodriguez v. Burnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)