Rodriguez v. Baker

61 N.Y.2d 804
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

61 N.Y.2d 804 (1984)

Luz M. Rodriguez, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of Alberto Miranda, an Infant, Respondent,
v.
George P. Baker et al., Respondents, and Poirer & McLane Corporation and Raymond DiMenna Corporation, a Joint Venture, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 10, 1984.
Decided February 16, 1984.

Patrick A. Lyons and Steven B. Prystowsky for appellants.

Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Pamela Seider Dolgow and Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Robert M. Ginsberg for plaintiff-respondent.

Thomas V. McMahon for George Baker and others, respondents, precluded.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and KAYE. Taking no part: Judge SIMONS.

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice ARNOLD L. FEIN at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 143).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Baker, 61 N.Y.2d 804 (N.Y. 1984).

61 N.Y.2d 804 (Rodriguez v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weinstock v. Jenkin Contracting Co.
134 A.D.2d 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Richard Drzewinski v. Atlantic Scaffold & Ladder Co.
515 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)