Rodriguez v. Baker

New York Court of Appeals

Rodriguez v. Baker

61 N.Y.2d 804

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 16, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 N.Y.2d 804 (Rodriguez v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. Baker, 61 N.Y.2d 804 (N.Y. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

61 N.Y.2d 804 (1984)

Luz M. Rodriguez, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of Alberto Miranda, an Infant, Respondent,
v.
George P. Baker et al., Respondents, and Poirer & McLane Corporation and Raymond DiMenna Corporation, a Joint Venture, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 10, 1984. Decided February 16, 1984.

Patrick A. Lyons and Steven B. Prystowsky for appellants.

Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Pamela Seider Dolgow and Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Robert M. Ginsberg for plaintiff-respondent.

Thomas V. McMahon for George Baker and others, respondents, precluded.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and KAYE. Taking no part: Judge SIMONS.

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice ARNOLD L. FEIN at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 143).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

61 N.Y.2d 804 (1984)

Luz M. Rodriguez, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of Alberto Miranda, an Infant, Respondent,
v.
George P. Baker et al., Respondents, and Poirer & McLane Corporation and Raymond DiMenna Corporation, a Joint Venture, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 10, 1984. Decided February 16, 1984.

Patrick A. Lyons and Steven B. Prystowsky for appellants.

Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Pamela Seider Dolgow and Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Robert M. Ginsberg for plaintiff-respondent.

Thomas V. McMahon for George Baker and others, respondents, precluded.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and KAYE. Taking no part: Judge SIMONS.

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice ARNOLD L. FEIN at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 143).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 N.Y.2d 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-baker-ny-1984.

Opinion

Luz M. Rodriguez, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of Alberto Miranda, an Infant, Respondent, v. George P. Baker et al., Respondents, and Poirer & McLane Corporation and Raymond DiMenna Corporation, a Joint Venture, Appellants.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Luz M. Rodriguez, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of Alberto Miranda, an Infant, Respondent,
v.
George P. Baker et al., Respondents, and Poirer & McLane Corporation and Raymond DiMenna Corporation, a Joint Venture, Appellants.