Rodriguez v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2007·No. 06-1878·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1878

VICTOR RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General; KENNETH R. JONES, Recreation Supervisor, Federal Correctional Institution,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (9:04-cv-22105-CWH)

Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 22, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Hearn Bailey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Victor Rodriguez appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting

defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and denying Rodriguez’s

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Rodriguez v. Ashcroft, No.

9:04-cv-22105-CWH (D.S.C. June 13, 2006; July 19, 2006). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Ashcroft, (4th Cir. 2007).

Rodriguez v. Ashcroft (Rodriguez v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.