Rodriguez v. Ashcroft

Fourth Circuit

Rodriguez v. Ashcroft

213 F. App'x 208

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2007·No. No. 06-1878·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Victor Rodriguez appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and denying Rodriguez’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rodriguez v. Ashcroft, No. 9:04-cv-22105-CWH, 2006 WL 1663809 (D.S.C. June 13, 2006; July 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Victor Rodriguez appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and denying Rodriguez’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rodriguez v. Ashcroft, No. 9:04-cv-22105-CWH, 2006 WL 1663809 (D.S.C. June 13, 2006; July 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rodriguez v. Ashcroft, 213 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

213 F. App'x 208 (Rodriguez v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.