Rodriguez v. ASE Industries, Inc.

739 N.W.2d 333, 480 Mich. 908
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 12, 2007
Docket133686
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 739 N.W.2d 333 (Rodriguez v. ASE Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. ASE Industries, Inc., 739 N.W.2d 333, 480 Mich. 908 (Mich. 2007).

Opinion

739 N.W.2d 333 (2007)

Raquel RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Pacific Employers Insurance, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
A.S.E. INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., and American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants, Cross-Defendants, and
Design Systems, Inc., Innovative Engineering, Inc., and PMI Management Group, Inc., Defendants.

Docket No. 133686. COA No. 263930.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 12, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issues: (1) whether the trial court properly made independent findings in avoidance of the cap on non-economic damages provided for in MCL 600.2946a(1) after the jury had made contrary findings; and (2) if the damages cap applies, whether the trial court properly applied the apportionment of fault between defendant and American Axle before applying the damages cap.

*334 The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the January 2008 session calendar for argument and submission. Appellant's brief and appendix must be filed no later than November 16, 2007, and appellees' brief and appendix, if appellees choose to submit an appendix, must be filed no later than December 17, 2007.

The Michigan Association of Justice, the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, and the Michigan Manufacturers Association are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., not participating due to a familial relationship with counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PONTIAC FIRE FIGHTERS UNION LOCAL 376 v. City of Pontiac
739 N.W.2d 333 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
739 N.W.2d 333, 480 Mich. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-ase-industries-inc-mich-2007.