PONTIAC FIRE FIGHTERS UNION LOCAL 376 v. City of Pontiac

739 N.W.2d 333, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2543, 2007 WL 2963833
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 10, 2007·No. 132916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

739 N.W.2d 333 (2007)

PONTIAC FIRE FIGHTERS UNION LOCAL 376, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF PONTIAC, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 132916. COA No. 271497.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 10, 2007.

On order of the Court, the motion to strike part of the defendant's appendix is DENIED. Although the defendant should have filed a motion to expand the record before filing the disputed material, this Court's order invited the parties to address the likelihood of success of the plaintiff's unfair labor practice claims. The disputed material appears to be relevant to that issue.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant the motion to strike.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PONTIAC FIRE FIGHTERS UNION LOCAL 376 v. City of Pontiac, 739 N.W.2d 333, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2543, 2007 WL 2963833 (Mich. 2007).

739 N.W.2d 333 (PONTIAC FIRE FIGHTERS UNION LOCAL 376 v. City of Pontiac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. ASE Industries, Inc.
739 N.W.2d 333 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)