Rodgers v. State

1976 OK CR 144, 552 P.2d 89
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodgers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 551 P.2d 295
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 18, 1976·No. No. F-75-769·Published

Opinions

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

Appellant, Joe Earl Rodgers, was convicted of the crime of Possession of Marijuana, With Intent to Distribute in the District Court, Tulsa County, Case No. CRF-74 — 2684. Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and the case was submitted for decision at a non-jury trial, upon a stipulation by both sides that the trial testimony would be the same as presented at the preliminary hearing, and all objections were preserved; sentence being set at five (5) years imprisonment.

A timely appeal has been perfected to this Court, raising two assignments of error as to the insufficiency of the Affidavit for Search Warrant and that the Affidavit for Search Warrant was not properly attested to. A review of the record and testimony of preliminary hearing, fails to sustain these assignments of error.

Where a careful reading of the record, and a study of the briefs, reveal no error that would justify modification or reversal, this Court may affirm said judgment and sentence by summary order, or brief statement or by opinion, as the Court [90]*90may see fit, as is prescribed by statute. See, 20 O.S.1971, § 49, and Ford v. State, Okl.Cr., 447 P.2d 454 (1968).

Therefore, the judgment and sentence of the trial court is hereby,

AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P. J., specially concurs. BLISS, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodgers v. State, 1976 OK CR 144, 552 P.2d 89 (Okla. Ct. App. 1976).

1976 OK CR 144 (Rodgers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffin v. State
1972 OK CR 320 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1972)
Ford v. State
1968 OK CR 212 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1968)