Ford v. State

1968 OK CR 212, 447 P.2d 454, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 442
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 27, 1968
DocketNo. A-14969
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1968 OK CR 212 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford v. State, 1968 OK CR 212, 447 P.2d 454, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 442 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Presiding Judge:

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of Uttering a Forged Instrument After Former Conviction in the District Court of Bryan County, Oklahoma, and sentenced to Thirteen Years in the penitentiary.

He has perfected his appeal to this Court raising several allegations of error. A review of the testimony and of the record fails to sustain these allegations.

Where a careful reading of the record and a study of the briefs reveal no error that would justify' reversal or modification, this Court may affirm said judgment and sentence by summary order, or brief statement or by opinion, as the Court may see fit, as is prescribed by statute. 20 O.S. § 49, 1968.

Therefore, the judgment and sentence of the lower court is hereby affirmed.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodgers v. State
1976 OK CR 144 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Gilmore v. State
1976 OK CR 39 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1968 OK CR 212, 447 P.2d 454, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-state-oklacrimapp-1968.