Ford v. State

1968 OK CR 212, 447 P.2d 454, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 442
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 27, 1968·No. No. A-14969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Presiding Judge:

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of Uttering a Forged Instrument After Former Conviction in the District Court of Bryan County, Oklahoma, and sentenced to Thirteen Years in the penitentiary.

He has perfected his appeal to this Court raising several allegations of error. A review of the testimony and of the record fails to sustain these allegations.

Where a careful reading of the record and a study of the briefs reveal no error that would justify' reversal or modification, this Court may affirm said judgment and sentence by summary order, or brief statement or by opinion, as the Court may see fit, as is prescribed by statute. 20 O.S. § 49, 1968.

Therefore, the judgment and sentence of the lower court is hereby affirmed.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. State, 1968 OK CR 212, 447 P.2d 454, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 442 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

1968 OK CR 212 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodgers v. State
1976 OK CR 144 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Gilmore v. State
1976 OK CR 39 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)