Gilmore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Gilmore v. State

1976 OK CR 39, 546 P.2d 632, 1976 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 692

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 12, 1976

DocketNo. F-75-691

StatusPublished

This text of 1976 OK CR 39 (Gilmore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilmore v. State, 1976 OK CR 39, 546 P.2d 632, 1976 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 692 (Okla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

Appellant, Audrey Elaine Gilmore, was convicted of the crime of Forgery in the Second Degree in the District Court, Seminole County, Case No. CR-75-33. According to the verdict of the jury, a sentence of three (3) years’ imprisonment was imposed.

She has perfected her appeal to this Court raising several assignments of error. A review of the testimony and of the record fails to sustain these assignments of error.

Where a careful reading of the record, and a study of the briefs, reveal no error that would justify modification or reversal, this Court may affirm said judgment and sentence by summary order, or brief statement or by opinion, as the Court may see fit, as is prescribed by statute.

See, 20 O.S.1971, § 49, and Ford v. State, Okl.Cr.,447 P.2d 454 (1968).

Therefore, the judgment and sentence of the trial court is hereby, affirmed.

However, considering all the facts and circumstances concerned in this case, defense counsel is admonished to consider the provisions of 22 O.S.1971, § 994, for consideration by the trial court.

BRETT, P. J., and BLISS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI