Rodgers v. State
355 S.W.3d 496, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 2011 WL 5065259
Opinion
ORDER
Reginald Rodgers appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings due to abandonment by his appointed post-conviction counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodgers v. State, 355 S.W.3d 496, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 2011 WL 5065259 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
355 S.W.3d 496 (Rodgers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simmons v. HEARTLAND WOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
355 S.W.3d 496 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)