Rodgers v. State

355 S.W.3d 496, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 2011 WL 5065259
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 25, 2011
DocketED 96240
StatusPublished

This text of 355 S.W.3d 496 (Rodgers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodgers v. State, 355 S.W.3d 496, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 2011 WL 5065259 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Rodgers appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings due to abandonment by his appointed post-conviction counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simmons v. HEARTLAND WOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
355 S.W.3d 496 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 S.W.3d 496, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 2011 WL 5065259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-state-moctapp-2011.