Rodgers v. B&H Photo

S.D. New York

Rodgers v. B&H Photo

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 7, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-06642·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MELODY JANNEL RODGERS, Plaintiff, 24cv6642 (LTS) -against- CIVIL JUDGMENT B&H PHOTO VIDEO, Defendant. For the reasons stated in the November 15, 2024, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court’s judgment would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 7, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MELODY JANNEL RODGERS, Plaintiff, 24cv6642 (LTS) -against- CIVIL JUDGMENT B&H PHOTO VIDEO, Defendant. For the reasons stated in the November 15, 2024, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court’s judgment would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 7, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Rodgers v. B&H Photo, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Rodgers v. B&H Photo (Rodgers v. B&H Photo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related