Roderick Palms v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 5, 2020·No. 14-19-00263-CR·Published

Opinion

Abatement Order filed March 5, 2020

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00263-CR NO. 14-19-00264-CR NO. 14-19-00265-CR

RODERICK PALMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1557128, 1557129, and 1557130

ORDER

Appellant’s appointed counsel, Douglas M. Durham, filed briefs concluding these appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). To comply with the requirements set forth in Anders, a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant must be filed in each appeal. In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 409 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). On February 13, 2020, we ordered Durham to file a motion

to withdraw in each appeal by February 23, 2020. We cautioned that if Durham failed to comply, his briefs might be stricken and the appeals abated for appointment of new counsel. No motions to withdraw have been filed.

Accordingly, we direct the judge of the 174th District Court to conduct a hearing immediately at which appellant, Durham, and counsel for the State shall participate to determine the reason for Durham’s failure to file motions to withdraw. Appellant may participate by videoconference. The judge shall either (1) establish a date certain by which Durham will file motions to withdraw in this court, or (2) allow Durham to withdraw and appoint new counsel for appellant. If new counsel is appointed, the Anders brief Durham filed will be stricken, and new counsel will be required to file a new brief for appellant in each appeal.

The judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and a reporter’s record of the hearing shall be made. The judge shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court by April 6, 2020. If Durham files motions to withdraw in this court before the date set for the hearing, the appeals will be reinstated, and the trial court need not hold a hearing.

The appeals are abated, treated as closed cases, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeals will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court also will consider appropriate motions to reinstate the appeals filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeals on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roderick Palms v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Roderick Palms v. State (Roderick Palms v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re Schulman
252 S.W.3d 403 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)