Roderick Palms v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 2020·No. 14-19-00263-CR·Published

Opinion

Order filed February 13, 2020

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00263-CR

NO. 14-19-00264-CR

NO. 14-19-00265-CR

RODERICK PALMS, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1557128, 1557129, and 1557130

ORDER

Appellant’s appointed counsel, Douglas M. Durham, filed briefs concluding these appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). To comply with the requirements set forth in Anders, a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant must be filed.

We order counsel to file a motion to withdraw in each appeal by February

23, 2020. If counsel fails to comply, his briefs may be stricken and the appeals abated for appointment of new counsel.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roderick Palms v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Roderick Palms v. State (Roderick Palms v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)