Rockwood v. DeRosa

279 So. 2d 54
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 8, 1973·No. 72-94·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

279 So.2d 54 (1973)

Robert N. ROCKWOOD and Elizabeth A. Rockwood, His Wife, Appellants,
v.
Frank DeROSA and Doris DeRosa, His Wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-94.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 8, 1973.

William F. Hunter, Jr., Hollywood, for appellants.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued to accelerate and foreclose a mortgage from appellees to him. Although the mortgagors were technically in default under the circumstances of this case, Schechtman v. Grobbel, Fla.App. 1969, 226 So.2d 1, foreclosure and acceleration were properly denied.

The mortgage here provided that the mortgagors would be liable for costs, including attorney fees due to their failure to comply with the mortgage terms. Appellants' actions were precipitated by appellees' default; therefore, appellants were entitled to reasonable attorney fees. Schechtman v. Grobbel, supra.

We reverse and remand with instructions to award appellant reasonable attorney fees.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., and DOWNEY, JAMES C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rockwood v. DeRosa, 279 So. 2d 54 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

279 So. 2d 54 (Rockwood v. DeRosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Siemer v. Geringer
617 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Savarese v. Schoner
464 So. 2d 695 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
La Boutique of Beauty Academy, Inc. v. Meloy
436 So. 2d 396 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Taylor
318 So. 2d 203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)