Rochetti v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rochetti v. State

689 So. 2d 1124, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1013, 1997 WL 63950

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 14, 1997

DocketNo. 96-2032

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 689 So. 2d 1124 (Rochetti v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rochetti v. State, 689 So. 2d 1124, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1013, 1997 WL 63950 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, the trial court orally imposed “standard costs” without any reference to authority or amount. The probation order included $250 for investigative costs and $150 for law enforcement investigative costs. There is no oral or written request in the record for such costs, no documentation to support the costs, and no finding of Ro-ehetti’s ability to pay these costs. The costs were imposed without compliance with section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1995) and must be stricken. See Adams v. State, 676 So.2d 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Golden v. State, 667 So.2d 933 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

JUDGMENT, SENTENCE and PROBATION ORDER AFFIRMED; CONDITIONS 17 AND 18 STRICKEN.

PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, the trial court orally imposed “standard costs” without any reference to authority or amount. The probation order included $250 for investigative costs and $150 for law enforcement investigative costs. There is no oral or written request in the record for such costs, no documentation to support the costs, and no finding of Ro-ehetti’s ability to pay these costs. The costs were imposed without compliance with section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1995) and must be stricken. See Adams v. State, 676 So.2d 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Golden v. State, 667 So.2d 933 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

JUDGMENT, SENTENCE and PROBATION ORDER AFFIRMED; CONDITIONS 17 AND 18 STRICKEN.

PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

689 So. 2d 1124, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1013, 1997 WL 63950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rochetti-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack