Rochester v. Rochester
53 S.E. 399, 124 Ga. 993, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 682
Opinion
The relief is obtained at the suit of the wife. The object of alimony is the support of the children as well as the wife. There may be reason for allowing alimony with direction that the same be applied to the use of one to the exclusion of the other. When the judge so finds without abusing his discretion, his judgment will not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rochester v. Rochester, 53 S.E. 399, 124 Ga. 993, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 682 (Ga. 1906).
53 S.E. 399 (Rochester v. Rochester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Jones
632 S.E.2d 121 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)
Eskew v. Eskew
34 S.E.2d 697 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Kirby v. Johnson
4 S.E.2d 643 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Waller v. Waller
136 S.E. 149 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Cason v. Cason
123 S.E. 713 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Edmondson v. Edmondson
57 S.E. 308 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)