Rochester Trust and Safe Deposit Company v. Hatch

6 N.E.2d 426, 273 N.Y. 507, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1247
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 19, 1937·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Orders reversed, with costs in all courts, and motion granted to the extent of strildng out the defenses pleaded to the separate causes of action for interest and taxes only on the authority of Johnson v. Meyer (242 App. Div. 798; affd., 268 N. Y. 701). Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion. (See 273 N. Y. 581.)

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Lehman and Finch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rochester Trust and Safe Deposit Company v. Hatch, 6 N.E.2d 426, 273 N.Y. 507, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1247 (N.Y. 1937).

6 N.E.2d 426 (Rochester Trust and Safe Deposit Company v. Hatch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southold Savings Bank v. Fisher
183 Misc. 794 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)
Central Hanover Bank v. Roslyn Estates, Inc.
266 A.D. 244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
Onondaga County Savings Bank v. Markson Bros.
182 Misc. 954 (New York County Courts, 1941)
White v. Wielandt
259 A.D. 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Burden v. Shaver
255 A.D. 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Black v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance
166 Misc. 318 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1937)
Rochester Trust and Safe Deposit Company v. Hatch
7 N.E.2d 702 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)