Robinson v. Taylor

127 S.E.2d 243, 257 N.C. 668, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 400
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 19, 1962·No. 98·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CuRiam.

This case involved settled, uncomplicated rules of law. The answer raised issues of fact which the jury resolved in favor of the plaintiffs who, nevertheless, were disappointed in the amount of damages awarded them. If there were any errors in the rulings on evidence or in the charge with reference to the first issues they were rendered harmless when the jury answered them in favor of the plaintiffs. Lyon v. R. R., 165 N.C. 143, 81 S.E. 1. The assignments of error which relate to the issue of damages disclose no prejudicial error. The trial judge who heard the evidence and observed the parties declined to set the verdict aside. This was a matter within his discertion. Dixon v. Young, 255 N.C. 578, 122 S.E. 2d 202. No abuse appears.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Taylor, 127 S.E.2d 243, 257 N.C. 668, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 400 (N.C. 1962).

127 S.E.2d 243 (Robinson v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Page v. Boyles
535 S.E.2d 561 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
329 S.E.2d 333 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1985)
Worthington v. Bynum
290 S.E.2d 599 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
Scallon v. Hooper
270 S.E.2d 496 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)