Dixon v. Young

122 S.E.2d 202, 255 N.C. 578, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 638
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 1, 1961·No. 383·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The plaintiff assigns as error the refusal of the trial judge to set aside the verdict on the issue of damages only and to grant a new trial thereon on the ground that the damages assessed by the jury were inadequate.

“The granting or the denying of a motion for a new trial on the ground that the damages assessed by the jury are excessive or inadequate is within the sound discretion of the trial judge.” Hinton v. Cline, 238 N.C. 136, 76 S.E. 2d 162, and cited cases.

In such cases, in the absence of an abuse of discretion, the ruling of the trial judge is not reviewable on appeal. An abuse of discretion has not been made to appear on this appeal.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixon v. Young, 122 S.E.2d 202, 255 N.C. 578, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 638 (N.C. 1961).

122 S.E.2d 202 (Dixon v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Justus v. Rosner
802 S.E.2d 142 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
Page v. Boyles
535 S.E.2d 561 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
In Re the Will of Buck
516 S.E.2d 858 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1999)
Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
329 S.E.2d 333 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1985)
Worthington v. Bynum
290 S.E.2d 599 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
Coletrane v. Christian
257 S.E.2d 445 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Robertson Ex Rel. Robertson v. Stanley
206 S.E.2d 190 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)
Callicutt v. Smith
148 S.E.2d 9 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Brown v. Griffin
138 S.E.2d 823 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Farmer v. Sidney Bryant Lands & Yellow Cab Co.
127 S.E.2d 553 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Robinson v. Taylor
127 S.E.2d 243 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)