Robinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Robinson v. State

86 S.E. 1072, 17 Ga. App. 375, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 429

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 19, 1915

Docket6955

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 S.E. 1072 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. State, 86 S.E. 1072, 17 Ga. App. 375, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 429 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

The motion for a new trial being based wholly on the general grounds as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and there being apparently no effort to brief the evidence in accordance with the requirements of the Civil Code, § 6093 (the paper filed as a brief of the evidence being apparently a full transcript of a stenographic report of the questions put to the witnesses and their answers), the judgment overruling the motion for .a new trial must be affirmed, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court. Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (4a.) (75 S. E. 254); s. c. 11 Ga. App. 208, (7), 213 (75 S. E. 258); Trueheart v. State, 13 Ga. App. 661 (2, 3) (79 S. E. 755); Crumpton v. State, 7 Ga. App. 841 (68 S. E. 334).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

The motion for a new trial being based wholly on the general grounds as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and there being apparently no effort to brief the evidence in accordance with the requirements of the Civil Code, § 6093 (the paper filed as a brief of the evidence being apparently a full transcript of a stenographic report of the questions put to the witnesses and their answers), the judgment overruling the motion for .a new trial must be affirmed, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court. Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (4a.) (75 S. E. 254); s. c. 11 Ga. App. 208, (7), 213 (75 S. E. 258); Trueheart v. State, 13 Ga. App. 661 (2, 3) (79 S. E. 755); Crumpton v. State, 7 Ga. App. 841 (68 S. E. 334).

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 S.E. 1072, 17 Ga. App. 375, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-gactapp-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack