Crumpton v. State
68 S.E. 334, 7 Ga. App. 841, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 549
Opinion
The failure to comply with the provisions of §5488 of the Civil Code, as to the preparation of the brief of the evidence, is so flagrant and palpable as to forbid this court’s examining the facts. See Lanham v. Presley, ante, 839 (68 S. E.), and cases there cited. However, we may say, in passing, that the' defendant was lawfully convicted of the very heinous crime with which he was charged. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crumpton v. State, 68 S.E. 334, 7 Ga. App. 841, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 549 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
68 S.E. 334 (Crumpton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blount-Hudson Chevrolet Co. v. Blount
191 S.E. 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Robinson v. State
86 S.E. 1072 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)